Editorial
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. Apr 15, 2012; 3(2): 44-50
Published online Apr 15, 2012. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v3.i2.44
Table 2 Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection
AuthorsYearMethodTotalMean sizeOperationEn blocLocalPerforation
lesions(mm)time (min)resection (%)recurrence (%)(%)
Takahashi et al[48]2010ESD11630 (4-95)73.9 (21–307)100 (116/116)0.9 (1/116)2.6 (3/116)
EMR18420 (4-60)44.4 (11–258)53.3 (98/184)9.8 (18/184)1.6 (3/184)
Ishihara et al[29]2008ESD32> 20110 (30–245)90.6 (29/32)3.1 (1/32)0 (0/32)
EMR46> 2035 (10–90)10.9 (5/46)23.9 (11/46)0 (0/46)
Ishihara et al[49]2008ESD311664100 (31/31)0 (0/31)3.2 (1/31)
EMR-C68132187 (59/68)0 (0/68)0 (0/68)
2-channel72121571 (51/72)2.8 (2/72)0 (0/72)
EMR