Novel CABIN score outperforms other prognostic models in predicting in-hospital mortality after salvage transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting

Table 1 Demographic, clinical characteristics and risk prediction scores of 34 patients undergoing salvage transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, n %

Variable	Total cohort (n = 34)	Survived (n = 24)	In-hospital death (n = 10)	P value
Demographics
Age (mean ± SD)	52 ± 11.6	50 ± 10.5	57 ± 12.9	0.107
Sex
Male	29 (85)	22 (92)	7 (70)	0.104
Female	5 (15)	2 (8)	3 (30)
Cause of cirrhosis
Alcohol related	22 (65)	15 (63)	7 (70)	0.938
Non-alcohol related	12 (35)	9 (37)	3 (30)
Child-Pugh grade
A	3 (9)	3 (12)	0	0.022
B	19 (56)	16 (67)	3 (30)
C	12 (35)	5 (20)	7 (70)
Risk prediction scores
APACHE II (mean ± SD)	13.4 ± 4.7	11.4 ± 3.3	18.3 ± 3.8	0.196
BOTEM (mean ± SD)	5.4 ± 1.1	5.0 ± 0.9	6.3 ± 0.7	0.964
CABIN (mean ± SD)	10.9 ± 5.0	8.3 ± 1.8	17.0 ± 3.8	0.133
CHILD-PUGH (mean ± SD)	8.9 ± 1.8	8.2 ± 1.8	10.6 ± 2.0	0.001
EMORY (mean ± SD)	3.2 ± 0.9	2.8 ± 0.7	4.3 ± 0.5	0.497
FIPS (mean ± SD)	-0.3 ± 0.9	-0.6 ± 0.9	0.5 ± 0.5	0.205
MELD (mean ± SD)	15.0 ± 6.2	13 ± 4.8	19.8 ± 6.7	0.007
MELD-Na (mean ± SD)	16.9 ± 7.4	14 ± 5.3	23.9 ± 7.1	< 0.001

SD: Standard deviation; APACHE II: Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II; BOTEM: Bonn TIPS early mortality; CABIN: Creatinine, Albumin, Bilirubin, INR, Sodium score; FIPS: Freiburg index of post-TIPS survival; MELD: Model for end-stage liver disease; MELD-Na: Model for end-stage liver disease sodium.