Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Radiol. Mar 28, 2017; 9(3): 126-133
Published online Mar 28, 2017. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i3.126
Published online Mar 28, 2017. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i3.126
Table 5 Data on agreement of the severity degree assigned on the articular side for partial tear between magnetic resonance arthrography (according to the most experienced reader) and arthroscopy
| Reader 1 | ||||||
| A0 | A1 | A2 | A3 | A4 | ||
| Arthroscopy | A0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| A1 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| A2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| A3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 0 | |
| A4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 | |
- Citation: Aliprandi A, Messina C, Arrigoni P, Bandirali M, Di Leo G, Longo S, Magnani S, Mattiuz C, Randelli F, Sdao S, Sardanelli F, Sconfienza LM, Randelli P. Reporting rotator cuff tears on magnetic resonance arthrography using the Snyder’s arthroscopic classification. World J Radiol 2017; 9(3): 126-133
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v9/i3/126.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v9.i3.126