Effects of oral contrast on dose in abdominopelvic computed tomography with pure iterative reconstruction

doi:10.4329/wjr.v8.i9.809

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 8, Issue 9

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (8898)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-5) series, Tables (1-1) series.

Item

Count

PDF

431

WORD

437

HTML

3277

Figures (1-5)

256

Tables (1-1)

262

Sum=4663

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

488

Download

1189

Sum=1677

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

852

Download

1706

Sum=2558

Sep 28, 2016 (publication date) through Jan 26, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (2)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Radiology

ISSN

1949-8470

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Prospective Study

World J Radiol. Sep 28, 2016; 8(9): 809-815
Published online Sep 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i9.809

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 5 Comparison of median subjective image quality parameters for all neutral and positive studies. ¹All neutral measurements were significantly superior. SN: Subjective noise; CR: Contrast resolution; SR: Spatial resolution; DA: Diagnostic acceptability.

Citation: Murphy KP, Healy LJ, Crush L, Twomey M, Moloney F, Sexton S, O’Connor OJ, Maher MM. Effects of oral contrast on dose in abdominopelvic computed tomography with pure iterative reconstruction. World J Radiol 2016; 8(9): 809-815
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v8/i9/809.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i9.809