Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Radiol. Sep 28, 2016; 8(9): 809-815
Published online Sep 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i9.809
Published online Sep 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i9.809
Figure 2 Comparison of size-specific dose estimated measurements for all studies in the neutral and positive cohorts and by body mass index range.
Group 1: BMI < 20 kg/m2; group 2: BMI 20-25 kg/m2; group 3: BMI 25-30 kg/m2; group 4: BMI > 30 kg/m2. Significant differences are denoted by1. BMI: Body mass index.
- Citation: Murphy KP, Healy LJ, Crush L, Twomey M, Moloney F, Sexton S, O’Connor OJ, Maher MM. Effects of oral contrast on dose in abdominopelvic computed tomography with pure iterative reconstruction. World J Radiol 2016; 8(9): 809-815
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v8/i9/809.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i9.809