Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Radiol. Jul 28, 2016; 8(7): 707-715
Published online Jul 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i7.707
Published online Jul 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i7.707
Table 2 Mean image quality scores for pre- and post-contrast radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination and cartesian volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination
| Image qualityparameter | Pre-contrast | Post-contrast | ||
| rVIBE | cVIBE | rVIBE | cVIBE | |
| Liver edge sharpness | 3.37 | 3.76 | 3.38 | 3.39 |
| Hepatic vessel clarity | 3.26 | 3.61 | 3.09 | 3.81 |
| Artifacts | 3.07 | 3.61 | 3.04 | 3.87 |
| Lesion conspicuity | 3.16 | 3.61 | 3.24 | 4.00 |
| Fat saturation | 3.96 | 4.02 | 4.10 | 4.22 |
| Overall image quality | 3.26 | 3.77 | 3.21 | 4.04 |
- Citation: Yedururi S, Kang HC, Wei W, Wagner-Bartak NA, Marcal LP, Stafford RJ, Willis BJ, Szklaruk J. Free-breathing radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination vs breath-hold cartesian volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination magnetic resonance imaging of the liver at 1.5T. World J Radiol 2016; 8(7): 707-715
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v8/i7/707.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i7.707