Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Radiol. Jul 28, 2016; 8(7): 693-699
Published online Jul 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i7.693
Published online Jul 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i7.693
Table 2 Analysis and comparison of focal liver lesions
| Iohexol 350 group | Iodixanol 270 group | P values | |||||
| No. of lesions | Mean diameter(mm) | CNR | No. of lesions | Mean diameter (mm) | CNR | ||
| Hypervascular lesions/arterial phase | 12 | 14.8 ± 8.23 | 2.522 ± 1.699 | 17 | 18.1 ± 8.15 | 2.266 ± 1.243 | 0.8532 |
| Hypodense lesions/portal phase | 23 | 28.2 ± 19.5 | 2.483 ± 1.187 | 28 | 24.1 ± 17.8 | 3.744 ± 2.255 | 0.0194 |
| Hypodense lesions/equilibrium phase | 21 | 28.4 ± 20.9 | 1.972 ± 0.9155 | 8 | 19.3 ± 11.0 | 2.395 ± 1.202 | 0.3162 |
- Citation: Botsikas D, Barnaure I, Terraz S, Becker CD, Kalovidouri A, Montet X. Value of liver computed tomography with iodixanol 270, 80 kVp and iterative reconstruction. World J Radiol 2016; 8(7): 693-699
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v8/i7/693.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i7.693