Correlation of magnetic resonance signal characteristics and perfusion parameters assessed by volume perfusion computed tomography in hepatocellular carcinoma: Impact on lesion characterization

doi:10.4329/wjr.v8.i7.683

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 8, Issue 7

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (6052)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-5) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

427

WORD

281

HTML

2562

Figures (1-5)

185

Tables (1-4)

201

Sum=3656

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1058

Download

1338

Sum=2396

Jul 28, 2016 (publication date) through Jul 26, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Radiology

ISSN

1949-8470

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Basic Study

World J Radiol. Jul 28, 2016; 8(7): 683-692
Published online Jul 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i7.683

Table 2 Volume perfusion computed tomography parameters in relation to the histologic grading

Histologic grading	BF (mL/100 g tissue/min)	BV (mL/100 mL)	k-trans (mL/100 g tissue/min)	ALP (mL/100 g tissue/min)	PVP (mL/100 g tissue/min)	HPI (%)
G1 (n = 15)	66.5 ± 30.5	15.8 ± 7.8	45.8 ± 18.4	56.4 ± 23.7	1.9 ± 2.1	95.2 ± 6.0
G2 (n = 18)	57.5 ± 18.9	13.7 ± 4.1	30.9 ± 13.7	46.3 ± 12.7	2.5 ± 2.9	93.9 ± 7.1
G3 (n = 3)	67.9 ± 2.8	22.1 ± 28.3	32.2 ± 8.5	41.2 ± 16.6	2.3 ± 0.3	93.9 ± 5.1
P value	¹0.52	¹0.34	¹0.21	¹0.24	¹0.78	¹0.71

¹Analysis of variance. BF: Blood flow; BV: Blood volume; ALP: Arterial liver perfusion; PVP: Portal venous perfusion; HPI: Hepatic perfusion index.

Citation: Grözinger G, Bitzer M, Syha R, Ketelsen D, Nikolaou K, Lauer U, Horger M. Correlation of magnetic resonance signal characteristics and perfusion parameters assessed by volume perfusion computed tomography in hepatocellular carcinoma: Impact on lesion characterization. World J Radiol 2016; 8(7): 683-692
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v8/i7/683.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i7.683