Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Radiol. May 28, 2016; 8(5): 449-459
Published online May 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i5.449
Table 4 Summary of randomized controlled clinical trials comparing different treatments to 90Y-transarterial radioembolization using resin spheres in colorectal liver metastases
Ref. Patients (n)ProtocolDesignSettingResponse (%)
Progression free survival (mo)Median survival (mo)
CRPRSDARPD
Gray et al[19] 36 TARE + HAI FUDR RCT - Phase III Early line 6 44 28 78 14 15.9 (liver) 17
34 TARE - HAI FUDR 0 22 48 70 30 9.7 (liver) 15.9
Van Hazel et al[21] 11 TARE + 5-FU/LV RCT - Phase II 1. line 0 91 9 100 0 18.6 29.4
10 5-FU/LV 0 0 60 60 40 3.6 12.8
Hendlisz et al[20] 21 TARE + 5-FU RCT - Phase III Salvage 0 10 80 90 10 4.5 10
23 5-FU 0 0 36 36 64 2.1 7.3
Gibbs et al[24] 267 TARE + FOLFOX ± Bevacizumab RCT - Phase III 1. line 4.5 71.9 NA NA NA 10.7/20.5 (liver) NA
263 FOLFOX ± Bevacizumab 1.5 66.5 NA NA NA 10.2/12.6 (liver) NA