Renal ablation using magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound: Magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology assessment

doi:10.4329/wjr.v8.i3.298

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 8, Issue 3

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (6980)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-8) series, Tables (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

494

WORD

240

HTML

3053

Figures (1-8)

188

Tables (1-3)

144

Sum=4119

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

1183

Download

1678

Sum=2861

Mar 28, 2016 (publication date) through Jul 5, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (5)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Radiology

ISSN

1949-8470

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Basic Study

World J Radiol. Mar 28, 2016; 8(3): 298-307
Published online Mar 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i3.298

Table 3 Lesions dimensions and volumes using single and double overlapping rectangular focal sonication

Energy dose (Joules)	CC (mm)	Transverse (mm)	AP (mm)	MRI volume (mm³)	Postmortem volume (mm³)
Single 3000	7.3 ± 0.07	7.8 ± 1.0	5.6 ± 0.1	317 ± 54	380 ± 111
Double 3000	7.9 ± 1.1	11.4 ± 1.6	7.5 ± 0.7	675 ± 41^a^c	587 ± 28^a
Single 4400	7.5 ± 0.7	7.8 ± 1.6	5.6 ± 0.7	354 ± 143	517 ± 52
Double 4400	11.4 ± 1.7	12.8 ± 3.0	10 ± 1.4	1450 ± 458^a^e^h	1280 ± 238^a^e^h

^aP < 0.05 2 × 3000J overlapping sonication vs single 3000J sonication;

^cP < 0.05 2 × 3000J overlapping sonication vs single 4400J sonication;

^eP < 0.05 2 × 4000J sonication vs single 3000J sonication; and

^hP < 0.01 2 × 4000J overlapping sonication vs 2 × 3000J overlapping sonication. CC: Cranial-caudal; AP: Anterio-posterior; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging.

Citation: Saeed M, Krug R, Do L, Hetts SW, Wilson MW. Renal ablation using magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound: Magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology assessment. World J Radiol 2016; 8(3): 298-307
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v8/i3/298.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i3.298