Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Radiol. Mar 28, 2016; 8(3): 298-307
Published online Mar 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i3.298
Published online Mar 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i3.298
Energy dose (Joules) | Temp (max) (°C) | Temp (avg) (°C) | Core body temp (°C) | HR (bpm) | O2-saturation (%) |
Single 3000 | 57 ± 3 | 56 ± 3 | 38.3 ± 0.6 | 89 ± 5 | 99 ± 1 |
Double 3000 | 61 ± 4 | 59 ± 4 | 38.1 ± 0.5 | 87 ± 4 | 99 ± 1 |
Single 4400 | 63 ± 6 | 61 ± 6 | 38.4 ± 0.4 | 86 ± 5 | 99 ± 1 |
Double 4400 | 63 ± 4 | 62 ± 5 | 38.5 ± 0.3 | 88 ± 4 | 99 ± 1 |
- Citation: Saeed M, Krug R, Do L, Hetts SW, Wilson MW. Renal ablation using magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound: Magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology assessment. World J Radiol 2016; 8(3): 298-307
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v8/i3/298.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i3.298