Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Radiol. Mar 28, 2016; 8(3): 255-267
Published online Mar 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i3.255
Table 1 A comparison of predicted doses based on the calculated electron monitor unit by electron monitor unit calculator and measured doses for irregular fields at different electron beam energies, applicators, interpolation methods and source-to-surface distances
Energy (MeV)Applicator (cm×cm)SSD (cm)Measured dose (cGy)Predicted dose (Poly) (cGy)Percentage difference (%)Predicted dose (Exp) (cGy)Percentage difference (%)
410 × 10100100.5101.51.04102.31.83
415 × 15100102.0103.81.79103.81.79
610 × 10100100.3101.51.16101.51.16
615 × 15100100.7101.81.08101.50.78
615 × 1510590.591.51.1291.20.78
615 × 1511081.482.71.5882.41.22
910 × 10100100.21010.79100.80.59
910 × 1010589.590.81.4490.61.22
915 × 15100100.21010.92100.50.32
915 × 1510589.890.91.1890.30.51
915 × 1511080.881.71.0181.71.01
1210 × 1010098.798.6-0.1198.80.06
1210 × 1010588.088.70.8588.91.03
1210 × 1011079.280.31.2980.41.46
1215 × 15100100.1100.70.5699.8-0.29
1215 × 1510589.890.60.8689.8-0.03
1610 × 1010097.698.40.7898.60.99
1610 × 1010587.388.61.5088.81.7
1610 × 1011079.180.21.3580.31.55
1615 × 1510099.7100.70.9699.90.11
1615 × 1510589.590.71.3289.90.42
1615 × 1511080.881.40.6981.350.69