Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Radiol. Mar 28, 2016; 8(3): 255-267
Published online Mar 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i3.255
Published online Mar 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i3.255
Energy (MeV) | Applicator (cm×cm) | SSD (cm) | Measured dose (cGy) | Predicted dose (Poly) (cGy) | Percentage difference (%) | Predicted dose (Exp) (cGy) | Percentage difference (%) |
4 | 10 × 10 | 100 | 100.5 | 101.5 | 1.04 | 102.3 | 1.83 |
4 | 15 × 15 | 100 | 102.0 | 103.8 | 1.79 | 103.8 | 1.79 |
6 | 10 × 10 | 100 | 100.3 | 101.5 | 1.16 | 101.5 | 1.16 |
6 | 15 × 15 | 100 | 100.7 | 101.8 | 1.08 | 101.5 | 0.78 |
6 | 15 × 15 | 105 | 90.5 | 91.5 | 1.12 | 91.2 | 0.78 |
6 | 15 × 15 | 110 | 81.4 | 82.7 | 1.58 | 82.4 | 1.22 |
9 | 10 × 10 | 100 | 100.2 | 101 | 0.79 | 100.8 | 0.59 |
9 | 10 × 10 | 105 | 89.5 | 90.8 | 1.44 | 90.6 | 1.22 |
9 | 15 × 15 | 100 | 100.2 | 101 | 0.92 | 100.5 | 0.32 |
9 | 15 × 15 | 105 | 89.8 | 90.9 | 1.18 | 90.3 | 0.51 |
9 | 15 × 15 | 110 | 80.8 | 81.7 | 1.01 | 81.7 | 1.01 |
12 | 10 × 10 | 100 | 98.7 | 98.6 | -0.11 | 98.8 | 0.06 |
12 | 10 × 10 | 105 | 88.0 | 88.7 | 0.85 | 88.9 | 1.03 |
12 | 10 × 10 | 110 | 79.2 | 80.3 | 1.29 | 80.4 | 1.46 |
12 | 15 × 15 | 100 | 100.1 | 100.7 | 0.56 | 99.8 | -0.29 |
12 | 15 × 15 | 105 | 89.8 | 90.6 | 0.86 | 89.8 | -0.03 |
16 | 10 × 10 | 100 | 97.6 | 98.4 | 0.78 | 98.6 | 0.99 |
16 | 10 × 10 | 105 | 87.3 | 88.6 | 1.50 | 88.8 | 1.7 |
16 | 10 × 10 | 110 | 79.1 | 80.2 | 1.35 | 80.3 | 1.55 |
16 | 15 × 15 | 100 | 99.7 | 100.7 | 0.96 | 99.9 | 0.11 |
16 | 15 × 15 | 105 | 89.5 | 90.7 | 1.32 | 89.9 | 0.42 |
16 | 15 × 15 | 110 | 80.8 | 81.4 | 0.69 | 81.35 | 0.69 |
- Citation: Chow JCL. Some computer graphical user interfaces in radiation therapy. World J Radiol 2016; 8(3): 255-267
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v8/i3/255.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i3.255