Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Radiol. Feb 28, 2016; 8(2): 200-209
Published online Feb 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i2.200
Published online Feb 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i2.200
Table 3 Sites and density characteristics showing different performance between 2-deoxy-2-(18F)fluoro-D-glucose and 18F-sodium positron emission tomography/computed tomography
| n | 18F-FDG | 18F-NaF | P | |
| Density | ||||
| Osteosclerotic | 89 | 0.005 | ||
| Sensitivity (%): | 42.86 (15.82-74.95) | 99.00 (64.57-99.00) | ||
| Specificity (%): | 97.00 (60.97-97.00) | 48.15 (35.39-61.15) | ||
| No lesion/bone marrow | 29 | 0.002 | ||
| Sensitivity(%): | 100.00 (60.97-100.00) | 48.15 (30.74-66.01) | ||
| Specificity(%): | 100.00 (34.24-100.00) | 100.00 (34.24-100.00) | ||
| Site | ||||
| Spine | 81 | 0.002 | ||
| Sensitivity (%): | 65.38 (51.80-76.85) | 100.00 (93.12-100.00) | ||
| Specificity (%): | 98.00 (88.30-98.00) | 13.45 (0.61-27.18) | ||
| Ribs | 118 | 0.04 | ||
| Sensitivity (%): | 83.96 (75.81-89.74) | 96.23 (90.70-98.52) | ||
| Specificity (%): | 78.37 (52.33-92.50) | 78.57 (52.41-92.43) |
- Citation: Capitanio S, Bongioanni F, Piccardo A, Campus C, Gonella R, Tixi L, Naseri M, Pennone M, Altrinetti V, Buschiazzo A, Bossert I, Fiz F, Bruno A, DeCensi A, Sambuceti G, Morbelli S. Comparisons between glucose analogue 2-deoxy-2-(18F)fluoro-D-glucose and 18F-sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography in breast cancer patients with bone lesions. World J Radiol 2016; 8(2): 200-209
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v8/i2/200.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i2.200