Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Radiol. Jan 28, 2016; 8(1): 50-58
Published online Jan 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i1.50
Published online Jan 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i1.50
Ref. | Design | Sample size | Fracture | Method | Accuracy |
Nemati S et al[28] | Single blind | 37 | Nasal bone | Physical exam | 100% |
Atighechi et al[29] | Prospective | 128 | Nasal bone | Physical exam | 84% |
Ogunmuyiwa et al[30] | Prospective | 21 | Zygomaticomaxillary | CT | 100% zygomaticarch |
90% infraorbital | |||||
25% frontozygomatic | |||||
Mohammadi et al[31] | Retrospective | 70 | Nasal bone | Physical exam | 97% |
Javadrashid et al[32] | Cross-sectional | 40 | Nasal bone | CT | 94.90% |
Lee et al[33] | Cross-sectional | 140 | Nasal bone | CT | 100% |
Blessmann et al[27] | Cross-sectional | 10 | Midfacial | CT | Undisplaced zygoma |
Jank et al[34] | Prospective | 13 | Orbital | CT | 92% medial wall 88% lateral wall |
88% medial wall | |||||
Jank et al[35] | Prospective | 40 | Orbital | CT | 90% lateral wall |
97% infraorbital | |||||
Jank et al[36] | Prospective | 58 | Orbital | CT | 96% orbital floor |
- Citation: Evirgen Ş, Kamburoğlu K. Review on the applications of ultrasonography in dentomaxillofacial region. World J Radiol 2016; 8(1): 50-58
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v8/i1/50.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i1.50