Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Radiol. Jul 28, 2015; 7(7): 170-179
Published online Jul 28, 2015. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i7.170
Published online Jul 28, 2015. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i7.170
Figure 4 Perfusion parameters vs size evaluation in depicting partial response.
Comparison of perfusion parameters in a case of left side clear cell renal cell carcinoma after start of anti-angiogenic therapy. Follow-up scan at 6 mo interval (B) showed at 6 mo interval shows decrease in permeability as compared to baseline scan (A) suggestive of partial response. However, no change in size of lesion noted between baseline (C) and follow-up (D) scans which would have been labelled as stable disease. MIP: Maximum peak intensity; TTP: Time to peak; BF: Blood flow; BV: Blood volume; MTT: Mean transit time; PMB: Permeanbility; CT: Computed tomography.
- Citation: Das CJ, Thingujam U, Panda A, Sharma S, Gupta AK. Perfusion computed tomography in renal cell carcinoma. World J Radiol 2015; 7(7): 170-179
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v7/i7/170.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v7.i7.170