Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Radiol. Dec 28, 2015; 7(12): 509-520
Published online Dec 28, 2015. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i12.509
Table 4 Overview of studies analysing mean apparent diffusion coefficient and delta apparent diffusion coefficient values of the rectal lesion for each MR study
Ref.n of patientsPre ADC mean RPre ADC mean NRPost ADC mean RPost ADC mean NRROC curve (highest accuracy)
Ippolito et al[45]300.88 ± 0.190.78 ± 0.091.47 ± 0.221.19 ± 0.201.28 (80%)
Kim et al[41]340.90 ± 0.060.94 ± 0.03
Jung et al[37]350.93 ± 0.091.03 ± 0.081.29 ± 0.131.18 ± 0.081.18 (77.1%)
Kim et al[6]401.62 ± 0.361.04 ± 0.241.20 (85%)
Curvo Semedo et al[43]501.07 ± 0.151.10 ± 0.191.39 ± 0.241.45 ± 0.281.41 (53%)
Ha et al[38]1000.59 ± 0.290.49 ± 0.221.33 ± 0.251.13 ± 0.321.20 (67%)
Genovesi[44]281.01 ± 0.061.29 ± 0.021.79 ± 0.511.37 ± 0.4329.5 (91.3%)
Cai et al[39]150.6590.8850.7131.027
Birlik et al[40]430.66 ± 0.100.72 ± 0.141.22 ± 0.260.95 ± 0.201.20 (60%)