Magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of stress urinary incontinence in women: Parameters differentiating urethral hypermobility and intrinsic sphincter deficiency

Table 3 Probability of urethral hypermobility diagnosis, alternative propensity scores, and covariate and outcome values

Predicted probability of urethral hypermobility	Score	FunnelingY = 1,n = 0	Suprapubicurethral sphincterlength (cm)	UH = 1ISD/mixed = 0
0.008	-4.77	1	1.8	0
0.020	-3.84	1	2.1	0
0.027	-3.53	1	2.2	0
0.027	-3.53	1	2.2	0
0.065	-2.6	1	2.5	0
0.149	-1.67	1	2.8	0
0.193	-1.36	1	2.9	0
0.377	-0.43	1	3.2	0
0.529	0.19	1	3.4	1
0.587	0.38	0	2.3	1
0.605	0.5	1	3.5	1
0.659	0.69	0	2.4	1
0.925	2.55	0	3.0	1
0.925	2.55	0	3.0	0
0.969	3.48	0	3.3	1
0.969	3.48	0	3.3	1
0.969	3.48	0	3.3	1
0.996	5.65	0	4.0	1

UH: Urethral hypermobility; ISD: Intrinsic sphincter defects.