Comparison of conventional radiography and MDCT in suspected scaphoid fractures

doi:10.4329/wjr.v7.i1.22

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 7, Issue 1

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (6770)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series.

Item

Count

PDF

467

WORD

484

HTML

3146

Figures (1-3)

239

Sum=4336

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

949

Download

1485

Sum=2434

Jan 28, 2015 (publication date) through Jul 7, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (9)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Radiology

ISSN

1949-8470

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Radiol. Jan 28, 2015; 7(1): 22-27
Published online Jan 28, 2015. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i1.22

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Conventional radiography (A and B) and multidetector computed tomography (C and D) revealed an acute hamate fracture as a secondary finding.

Citation: Behzadi C, Karul M, Henes FO, Laqmani A, Catala-Lehnen P, Lehmann W, Nagel HD, Adam G, Regier M. Comparison of conventional radiography and MDCT in suspected scaphoid fractures. World J Radiol 2015; 7(1): 22-27
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v7/i1/22.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v7.i1.22