Atherosclerosis imaging using 3D black blood TSE SPACE vs 2D TSE

Figure 5 Bland-Altman plot of differences in total vessel area (two-dimensional-three-dimensional) vs means of total vessel area. A: Bland-Altman plot of difference in right common carotid (RCC) total vessel area [two-dimensional (2D)-3D] vs mean RCC total vessel area. Bland-Altman plot showing that the mean of the difference in RCC total vessel area between 2D and 3D techniques falls below the zero line indicating that there is a bias and that the two methods are not producing the same results; B: Bland-Altman plot of difference in left common carotid (LCC) total vessel area (2D-3D) versus mean LCC total vessel area. Bland-Altman plot showing that the mean of the difference in LCC total vessel area between 2D and 3D techniques falls below the zero line indicating that there is a bias and that the two methods are not producing the same results; C: Bland-Altman plot of difference in aorta total vessel area (2D-3D) vs mean aorta total vessel area. Bland-Altman plot showing that the mean of the difference in aorta total vessel area between 2D and 3D techniques falls below the zero line indicating that there is a bias and that the two methods are not producing the same results; D: Bland-Altman plot of difference in right femoral (RF) total vessel area (2D-3D) vs mean RF total vessel area. Bland-Altman plot showing that the mean of the difference in RF total vessel area between 2D and 3D techniques falls below the zero line indicating that there is a bias and that the two methods are not producing the same results; E: Bland-Altman plot of difference in left femoral (LF) total vessel area (2D-3D) vs mean LF total vessel area. Bland-Altman plot showing that the mean of the difference in LF total vessel area between 2D and 3D techniques falls below the zero line indicating that there is a bias and that the two methods are not producing the same results.