Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Radiol. May 28, 2014; 6(5): 210-217
Published online May 28, 2014. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.210
Published online May 28, 2014. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.210
DAP | DL | DSum | DEff | |||||
Range | Mean | Range | Mean | Range | Mean | Range | Mean | |
Localizer radiograph | ||||||||
Average | 0.20, 0.46 | 0.06 ± 0.14 | -0.17, 0.55 | 0.12 ± 0.18 | -0.26, 0.50 | 0.04 ± 0.17 | -0.25, 0.47 | 0.04 ± 0.16 |
Maximum | -0.32, 0.01 | -0.21 ± 0.08 | -0.13, 0.50 | 0.08 ± 0.17 | -0.28, 0.27 | 0.01 ± 0.16 | -0.30, 0.43 | 0.00 ± 0.16 |
Minimum | -0.26, 0.11 | -0.11 ± 0.09 | -0.17, 0.65 | 0.26 ± 0.23 | -0.27, 0.26 | 0.03 ± 0.19 | -0.27, 0.59 | 0.04 ± 0.19 |
Mid location | -0.30, 0.08 | -0.15 ± 0.10 | -0.17, 0.69 | 0.13 ± 0.23 | -0.22, 0.56 | 0.16 ± 0.23 | -0.20, 0.64 | 0.12 ± 0.17 |
Transverse computed tomography images | ||||||||
Average | -0.23, 0.59 | 0.13 ± 0.14 | -0.13, 0.50 | 0.15 ± 0.16 | -0.27, 0.50 | 0.11 ± 0.15 | -0.26, 0.53 | 0.11 ± 0.15 |
Maximum | -0.25, 0.67 | 0.18 ± 0.19 | -0.13, 0.50 | 0.08 ± 0.16 | -0.17, 0.59 | 0.08 ± 0.15 | -0.29, 0.53 | 0.10 ± 0.17 |
Minimum | -0.16, 0.66 | 0.13 ± 0.16 | -0.06, 0.70 | 0.31 ± 0.19 | -0.20, 0.61 | 0.11 ± 0.17 | -0.14, 0.59 | 0.16 ± 0.15 |
Mid location | -0.25, 0.74 | -0.10 ± 0.17 | -0.17, 0.55 | 0.19 ± 0.20 | -0.12, 0.56 | 0.16 ± 0.14 | -0.19, 0.64 | 0.10 ± 0.23 |
- Citation: Pourjabbar S, Singh S, Padole A, Saini A, Blake MA, Kalra MK. Size-specific dose estimates: Localizer or transverse abdominal computed tomography images? World J Radiol 2014; 6(5): 210-217
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v6/i5/210.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.210