Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Radiol. May 28, 2014; 6(5): 210-217
Published online May 28, 2014. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.210
Published online May 28, 2014. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.210
Table 1 Number of measurements is illustrated in details
| Number of patients | Number of intervals based on scan length + average of intervals, max, min, mid-scan length | Number of diameters (AP, Lat, AP + Lat, √ AP * Lat) on transverse images and localizer | Number of SSDE | Number of calculated SSDE in all patients |
| 4 | 8 + 4 | 96 | 96 | 384 |
| 24 | 9 + 4 | 104 | 104 | 2496 |
| 18 | 10 + 4 | 112 | 112 | 2016 |
| 4 | 11 + 4 | 120 | 120 | 480 |
| Total = 50 | Total = 5376 |
- Citation: Pourjabbar S, Singh S, Padole A, Saini A, Blake MA, Kalra MK. Size-specific dose estimates: Localizer or transverse abdominal computed tomography images? World J Radiol 2014; 6(5): 210-217
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v6/i5/210.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.210