Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. Aug 28, 2013; 5(8): 285-294
Published online Aug 28, 2013. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i8.285
Published online Aug 28, 2013. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i8.285
Characteristic | 1.5 Tesla | 3.0 Tesla | P value |
Age (yr) | |||
median (range) | 56 | 55 | 0.59 |
(35-85) | (26-85) | ||
Family history of breast cancer | |||
None | 77 (79) | 101 (74) | 0.53 |
Weak1 | 10 (10) | 19 (14) | 0.43 |
Intermediate2 | 5 (5) | 11 (8) | 0.44 |
Strong3 | 6 (6) | 5 (4) | 0.53 |
Index cancer size (mm) | |||
Mean (range) | 17.3 | 18.1 | 0.68 |
(4.0-70.0) | (3.0-92.0) | ||
Index cancer histology | |||
Invasive ductal carcinoma | 67 (68) | 91 (67) | 0.13 |
Not otherwise specified | 65 (66) | 86 (63) | 0.14 |
Mucinous type | 1 (1) | 3 (2) | |
Medullary type | 0 | 1 (0.7) | |
Papillary type | 0 | 1 (0.7) | |
Tubular type | 1 (1) | 0 | |
Invasive lobular carcinoma | 3 (3) | 3 (2) | 0.11 |
Mixed invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma | 3 (3) | 5 (4) | 0.70 |
Ductal carcinoma in situ | 25 (26) | 37 (27) | 0.56 |
- Citation: Butler RS, Chen C, Vashi R, Hooley RJ, Philpotts LE. 3.0 Tesla vs 1.5 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. World J Radiol 2013; 5(8): 285-294
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v5/i8/285.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v5.i8.285