Original Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. Apr 28, 2013; 5(4): 156-165
Published online Apr 28, 2013. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i4.156
Table 3 Comparison of publications using T2*w imaging and susceptibility-weighted imaging n (%)
T2*w imagingpublications (patients)SWIpublications (patients)
Number of publications17 (692)127 (518)1
Presence of vessel signs54%81%
16 (668)21 (334)
Interrater agreementκ = 0.7 to > 0.9 and ICC = 0.99-
6 (210)
Reliability assessmentr = 0.92-0.96-
1 (20)
Occluded vessel
Anterior circulation12 (598)122 (331)1
Large arteries1 (20)-
Critical MCA stenosis1 (2)-
TIA-1 (9)
BA-1 (1)2
NS3 (72)34 (178)
Time from onset
≤ 6 h9 (317)2 (18)4
> 6 h5 (282)12 (364)1
3.5-8.5 h-1 (49)
NS3 (93)313 (87)
Outcome
Worse outcome1 (49)3 (161)
Better NIHSS improvement4 (107)-
Better outcome with normalisation-1 (19)
No correlation3 (141)1 (44)
Validation method
DSC-MRI7 (260)10 (181)
FAIR3 (81)1 (30)
Conventional MRI3 (234)11 (242)
15O-PET1 (NS)-
DSA1 (22)-
Field strength
1.5 T3 (97)7 (83)
3 T8 (205)3 (80)
NS6 (390)1317 (355)15