Virtual colonoscopy: Utility, impact and overview

doi:10.4329/wjr.v5.i3.61

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 5, Issue 3

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (3661)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-5) series.

Item

Count

PDF

361

HTML

3108

Figures (1-5)

192

Sum=3661

Mar 28, 2013 (publication date) through Jul 29, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (8)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Radiology

ISSN

1949-8470

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Topic Highlight

World J Radiol. Mar 28, 2013; 5(3): 61-67
Published online Mar 28, 2013. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i3.61

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 A 58-year-old man underwent computed tomography colonoscopy for a failed optical colonoscopy due to sigmoid stricture. Computed tomography colonography was performed which showed a 1.5 cm cecal mass (arrow). Patient underwent right hemicolectomy and pathology confirmed cecal carcinoma. Failed optical colonoscopy is one of the most common indications for virtual colonoscopy.

Citation: Ganeshan D, Elsayes KM, Vining D. Virtual colonoscopy: Utility, impact and overview. World J Radiol 2013; 5(3): 61-67
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v5/i3/61.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v5.i3.61