Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. Nov 28, 2013; 5(11): 421-429
Published online Nov 28, 2013. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i11.421
Published online Nov 28, 2013. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i11.421
Figure 5 Image noise vs radiation dose in air.
For pulmonary imaging, the noise reduction was 45% and 31% for iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection, respectively. For the Stellar detector and iterative reconstruction alone, the average dose reduction was 80% and 70%, respectively.
- Citation: Christe A, Heverhagen J, Ozdoba C, Weisstanner C, Ulzheimer S, Ebner L. CT dose and image quality in the last three scanner generations. World J Radiol 2013; 5(11): 421-429
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v5/i11/421.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v5.i11.421