Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. Aug 28, 2012; 4(8): 353-371
Published online Aug 28, 2012. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i8.353
Published online Aug 28, 2012. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i8.353
Figure 12 Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic imaging modalities for atherosclerotic plaque characterization.
The range of sensitivity is used for accuracy quantification. Echocardiography is the cost comparator where costs of other modalities are a ratio of x-fold higher costs. Indicated intravascular imaging costs add-up catheterization costs (costs are unit operating costs, not charges). CE-US: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; CE-CT: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography; CE-MRI: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; CT: Computed tomography; US: Ultrasound; SPECT: Single photon emission computed tomography; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; OCT: Optical coherence tomography; IVUS: Intravascular ultrasound; IVMRI: Intravascular magnetic resonance imaging.
- Citation: Soloperto G, Casciaro S. Progress in atherosclerotic plaque imaging. World J Radiol 2012; 4(8): 353-371
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v4/i8/353.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v4.i8.353