Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. May 28, 2012; 4(5): 207-214
Published online May 28, 2012. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i5.207
Published online May 28, 2012. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i5.207
Table 4 Patient-stage based diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging and positron emission tomography and computed tomography n (%)
| Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | |
| Stage I | |||
| DWI (n = 13) | 1/2 (50.0) | 5/11 (45.5) | 6/13 (46.2) |
| PET/CT (n = 13) | 0/2 (42.9) | 11/11 (100.0) | 11/13 (84.6) |
| Stage II | |||
| DWI (n = 9) | 4/4 (100.0) | 2/5 (40.0) | 6/9 (66.7) |
| PET/CT (n = 9) | 2/4 (50.0) | 4/5 (80.0) | 6/9 (66.7) |
| Stage III | |||
| DWI (n = 3) | 3/3 (100.0) | 0/0 (0) | 3/3 (100.0) |
| PET/CT (n = 3) | 2/3 (66.7) | 0/0 (0) | 2/3 (66.7) |
- Citation: Kitajima K, Yamasaki E, Kaji Y, Murakami K, Sugimura K. Comparison of DWI and PET/CT in evaluation of lymph node metastasis in uterine cancer. World J Radiol 2012; 4(5): 207-214
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v4/i5/207.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v4.i5.207