Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. May 28, 2012; 4(5): 207-214
Published online May 28, 2012. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i5.207
Published online May 28, 2012. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i5.207
Table 1 Overall patient- and region-based diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging and positron emission tomography and computed tomography n (%)
Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Accuracy | |
Patient-based DWI (n = 25) | 8/9 (88.9) | 7/16 (43.8) | 8/17 (47.1) | 7/8 (87.5) | 15/25 (60.0) |
PET/CT (n = 25) | 4/9 (44.4) | 15/16 (93.8) | 4/5 (80.0) | 15/20 (75.0) | 16/25 (64.0) |
Region-based DWI (n = 200) | 30/36 (83.3) | 84/164 (51.2) | 30/110 (27.3) | 84/90 (93.3) | 114/200 (57.0) |
PET/CT (n = 200) | 14/36 (38.9) | 158/164 (96.3) | 14/20 (70.0) | 158/180 (87.8) | 172/200 (86.0) |
- Citation: Kitajima K, Yamasaki E, Kaji Y, Murakami K, Sugimura K. Comparison of DWI and PET/CT in evaluation of lymph node metastasis in uterine cancer. World J Radiol 2012; 4(5): 207-214
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v4/i5/207.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v4.i5.207