Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. Jan 28, 2012; 4(1): 21-28
Published online Jan 28, 2012. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i1.21
Published online Jan 28, 2012. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i1.21
Baseline (200 mAs) | Unpro (150 mAs) | Pro (150 mAs) | Unpro (100 mAs) | Pro (100 mAs) | Unpro (50 mAs) | Pro (50 mAs) | |
Liver | |||||||
Objective noise | 15.5 ± 3.9 | 18.2 ± 4.9 | 14.4 ± 4.0 | 21.9 ± 5.6 | 15.7 ± 4.0 | 30.4 ± 9.2 | 18.8 ± 5.0 |
HU values | 70.9 ± 15.0 | 70.5 ± 16.9 | 70.6 ± 16.0 | 71.2 ± 16.0 | 71.0 ± 16.0 | 70.1 ± 16.0 | 70.1 ± 16.0 |
Abdominal Aorta | |||||||
Objective noise | 17.4 ± 4.2 | 20.5 ± 5.4 | 16.0 ± 3.8 | 24.8 ± 6.2 | 18.5 ± 4.2 | 34.3 ± 9.3 | 22.0 ± 6.0 |
HU values | 80.5 ± 29.0 | 81.6 ± 37.0 | 81.5 ± 31.0 | 82.0 ± 33.7 | 82.1 ± 33.0 | 80.3 ± 31.0 | 80.0 ± 31.0 |
- Citation: Singh S, Kalra MK, Sung MK, Back A, Blake MA. Radiation dose reduction with application of non-linear adaptive filters for abdominal CT. World J Radiol 2012; 4(1): 21-28
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v4/i1/21.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v4.i1.21