Copyright
©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. Jan 28, 2012; 4(1): 21-28
Published online Jan 28, 2012. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i1.21
Published online Jan 28, 2012. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i1.21
Baseline (200 mAs) | Unpro (150 mAs) | Pro (150 mAs) | Unpro (100 mAs) | Pro (100 mAs) | Unpro (50 mAs) | Pro (50 mAs) | |
No. of lesions | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 |
Lesion size (< 1 cm) | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 28 |
Lesion conspicuity | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Image noise | 2 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 4 |
Visibility of small structures | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
Image contrast | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Diagnostic confidence | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 |
- Citation: Singh S, Kalra MK, Sung MK, Back A, Blake MA. Radiation dose reduction with application of non-linear adaptive filters for abdominal CT. World J Radiol 2012; 4(1): 21-28
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v4/i1/21.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v4.i1.21