Review
Copyright ©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. Nov 28, 2011; 3(11): 256-265
Published online Nov 28, 2011. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v3.i11.256
Table 2 Radiation dose, scanning parameters, and diagnostic performances of computed tomography examination using low dose protocols in urolithiasis
AuthorsYrLow dose CT protocols
Diagnostic performance
Effective dose (mSv)
CT scannerkVpmA (mAs)PitchS.T. (mm)Sensitivity (%)Specificity (%)Accuracy (%)
Liu et al[7]2000SDCT120(280)279796972.8
Meagher et al[8]2001SDCT, 4MDCT120-13063-1301.4-1.8593NANA3.5 (2.8-4.5)
Hamm et al[9]20024MDCT12070259697NA1.5
Heneghan et al[10]2003SDCT140100 (76)1.55NANA90-946.4
4MDCT0.7511
Tack et al[11]20034MDCT120(30)1.5390-9594-10093-981.2-1.9
Knöpfle et al[12]20034MDCT12070259897NA0.97 (male)/ 1.35 (female)
Kluner et al[13]200616MDCT12020 (6.9)1.4359795NA0.5-0.7
Poletti et al[14]20074MDCT12074 (30)1.25586-9697-100NANA