Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Radiol. Mar 28, 2025; 17(3): 100168
Published online Mar 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i3.100168
Published online Mar 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i3.100168
Table 2 Magnetic resonance imaging predictors of disease control in acromegaly
| N = 77 | Controlled | Not controlled | P value |
| T2-weighted hyperintensity (n: 16), n (%) | 8 (50) | 8 (50) | 0.57 |
| Macroadenoma (n: 51), n (%) | 28 (54) | 23 (45) | 0.88 |
| Microadenoma (n: 26), n (%) | 16 (60) | 10 (40) | |
| Adenoma volume | 3202 (SD: 4845) (95%CI: 621-5784) | 5513 (SD: 7447) (95%CI: 1545-9482) | 0.15 |
| Vertical extension (n: 22), n (%) | 9 (40) | 13 (59) | 0.07 |
| Horizontal extension (n: 20), n (%) | 10 (50) | 10 (50) | 0.60 |
- Citation: Alvarez M, Donato A, Rincon J, Rincon O, Lancheros N, Mancera P, Guzman I. Evaluation of pituitary tumor volume as a prognostic factor in acromegaly: A cross-sectional study in two centers. World J Radiol 2025; 17(3): 100168
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v17/i3/100168.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i3.100168