Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Radiol. Feb 28, 2025; 17(2): 102462
Published online Feb 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i2.102462
Table 4 Distribution of subjective image scoring for different protocols by the two radiologists
Blood vessel visualization (1/2/3/4)
Reviewer 1
Reviewer 2
Agreement (κ)
Portal vein
PVP0/0/0/520/0/0/52NA
EP0/0/2/500/0/1/510.66
CE boost (EP)0/0/0/520/0/0/52NA
Segmental branch of the portal vein
PVP0/0/2/500/0/1/510.66
EP1/2/39/101/4/35/120.66
CE boost (EP)0/2/2/480/2/3/470.64
Lesion conspicuity (1/2/3/4)
PVP0/6/21/250/6/29/170.43
EP1/6/26/191/5/28/180.81
CE boost (EP)0/3/15/340/2/14/360.38
Image noise (1/2/3/4)
PVP0/0/10/420/0/6/460.71
EP0/0/10/420/0/6/460.71
CE boost (EP)0/2/41/90/2/40/100.84