Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Radiol. Feb 28, 2025; 17(2): 102462
Published online Feb 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i2.102462
Published online Feb 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i2.102462
Table 4 Distribution of subjective image scoring for different protocols by the two radiologists
Blood vessel visualization (1/2/3/4) | Reviewer 1 | Reviewer 2 | Agreement (κ) |
Portal vein | |||
PVP | 0/0/0/52 | 0/0/0/52 | NA |
EP | 0/0/2/50 | 0/0/1/51 | 0.66 |
CE boost (EP) | 0/0/0/52 | 0/0/0/52 | NA |
Segmental branch of the portal vein | |||
PVP | 0/0/2/50 | 0/0/1/51 | 0.66 |
EP | 1/2/39/10 | 1/4/35/12 | 0.66 |
CE boost (EP) | 0/2/2/48 | 0/2/3/47 | 0.64 |
Lesion conspicuity (1/2/3/4) | |||
PVP | 0/6/21/25 | 0/6/29/17 | 0.43 |
EP | 1/6/26/19 | 1/5/28/18 | 0.81 |
CE boost (EP) | 0/3/15/34 | 0/2/14/36 | 0.38 |
Image noise (1/2/3/4) | |||
PVP | 0/0/10/42 | 0/0/6/46 | 0.71 |
EP | 0/0/10/42 | 0/0/6/46 | 0.71 |
CE boost (EP) | 0/2/41/9 | 0/2/40/10 | 0.84 |
- Citation: Tachibana Y, Otsuka K, Shiroo T, Asayama Y. Equilibrium phase images of the liver using a contrast-enhancement boost instead of the portal vein phase. World J Radiol 2025; 17(2): 102462
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v17/i2/102462.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i2.102462