Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Radiol. Feb 28, 2025; 17(2): 102462
Published online Feb 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i2.102462
Published online Feb 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i2.102462
Table 3 Comparison by qualitative image analysis, mean ± SD
Characteristics | PVP | EP | CE-boost (EP) | aP value | bP value |
Vascular visualization | |||||
Portal vein | 4 ± 0.00 | 3.97 ± 0.15 | 4 ± 0.00 | NA | 0.16 |
Segmental branch of the portal vein | 3.97 ± 0.15 | 3.12 ± 0.55 | 3.88 ± 0.42 | 0.14 | < 0.01 |
Lesion conspicuity | 3.29 ± 0.60 | 3.21 ± 0.69 | 3.63 ± 0.51 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
Image noise | 3.85 ± 0.34 | 3.85 ± 0.34 | 3.14 ± 0.44 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
- Citation: Tachibana Y, Otsuka K, Shiroo T, Asayama Y. Equilibrium phase images of the liver using a contrast-enhancement boost instead of the portal vein phase. World J Radiol 2025; 17(2): 102462
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v17/i2/102462.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i2.102462