Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Radiol. Jan 28, 2025; 17(1): 99207
Published online Jan 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i1.99207
Published online Jan 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i1.99207
Table 1 Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging sequences
Sequence | Orientation | Resp | Slice thickness (mm) | Slice gap (mm) | Slices | TE (millisecond) | TR (millisecond) | Time (minute: second) | Stations |
DWIBS | Axial | No | 6.0 | 1.0 | 43 | 58 | 8400 | 3:13 | 4 |
T2 | Coronal | No | 5.0 | 1.0 | 54 | 80 | 1300 | 1:08 | 3 |
T2 STIR | Coronal | No | 5.0 | 1.0 | 54 | 70 | 14100 | 0:57 | 3 |
T1 DCE | Axial | 4D-FB | 4.0 | -2.0 | 185 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 5:50 | 1 |
T1 DIXON | Axial | BH | 4.0 | -2.0 | 137 | 1.3 | 3.5 | 0:15 | 4 |
- Citation: Lambert L, Wagnerova M, Vodicka P, Benesova K, Zogala D, Trneny M, Burgetova A. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging provides accurate staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, but is less preferred by patients. World J Radiol 2025; 17(1): 99207
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v17/i1/99207.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i1.99207