Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Radiol. Jun 28, 2024; 16(6): 211-220
Published online Jun 28, 2024. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i6.211
Published online Jun 28, 2024. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i6.211
Table 2 Diagnostic performance of computed tomography characteristics and their combination (named as “model”) in differentiating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with cystic changes from solid pseudopapillary neoplasms
Variables | AUC | Sensitivity, % | Specificity, % | Accuracy, % | PPV, % | NPV, % |
Tumor size | 0.634 | 79 | 53 | 61 | 42 | 85 |
“Floating cloud” sign | 0.708 | 57 | 84 | 76 | 62 | 82 |
Peripancreatic invasion or distal metastasis | 0.683 | 43 | 94 | 78 | 75 | 79 |
Model | 0.833 | 79 | 81 | 80 | 65 | 90 |
- Citation: Ren S, Qian LC, Lv XJ, Cao YY, Daniels MJ, Wang ZQ, Song LN, Tian Y. Comparison between solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with cystic changes using computed tomography. World J Radiol 2024; 16(6): 211-220
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v16/i6/211.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v16.i6.211