Characterization of tumors of jaw: Additive value of contrast enhancement and dual-energy computed tomography

doi:10.4329/wjr.v16.i4.82

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 16, Issue 4

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (2096)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Figures (1-6) series, Tables (1-6) series.

Item

Count

PDF

HTML

1064

Figures (1-6)

137

Tables (1-6)

152

Sum=1401

Featured Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

113

Download

268

Sum=381

Publishing Process of This Article

Item

Count

Browse

Download

212

Sum=248

Apr 28, 2024 (publication date) through Dec 2, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (1)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Radiology

ISSN

1949-8470

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Observational Study

World J Radiol. Apr 28, 2024; 16(4): 82-93
Published online Apr 28, 2024. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i4.82

Table 6 Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography quantitative parameters based on morphology

Lytic unilocular (n = 21)	Amelo, n = 7 (mean ± SD)	OKC, n = 6 (mean ± SD)	CGCG, n = 2 (mean ± SD)	OF, n = 2 (mean ± SD)	Non-tumorous, n = 4 (mean ± SD)
Mean HU	115 ± 18.3	33 ± 12.4	135 ± 24	87 ± 17.9	67 ± 17.9
IC	28 ± 8.3	7.2 ± 5.8	32.9 ± 6.8	18.8 ± 9.5	8.8 ± 9.5
WC	1030.5 ± 12.8	1010 ± 11.3	1043 ± 11.6	1038 ± 11.4	1018 ± 11.4
NIC	0.37 ± 0.15	0.10 ± 0.1	0.72 ± 0.3	0.45 ± 0.24	0.25 ± 0.24
Lytic multilocular (n = 18)	Amelo, n = 8 (mean ± SD)	CGCG, n = 4 (mean ± SD)	SG tumors, n = 2 (mean ± SD)	Malignancy, n = 3 (mean ± SD)	Non-tumorous, n = 1 (mean ± SD)
Mean HU	123 ± 21.3	152 ± 20.4	94.2 ± 24.3	120 ± 37.9	69 ± 18.9
IC	29 ± 9.3	35.1 ± 9.8	17.85 ± 6.8	24.8 ± 11.5	10 ± 2.5
WC	1032.5 ± 12.8	1048 ± 11.3	1038 ± 11.6	1040 ± 11.4	1011 ± 11.4
NIC	0.35 ± 0.15	0.54 ± 0.19	0.18 ± 0.05	0.39 ± 0.24	0.29 ± 0.1
Mixed-sclerotic (n = 16)	Amelo, n = 5 (mean ± SD)	CGCG, n = 5 (mean ± SD)	OFs, n = 4 (mean ± SD)	CMF, n = 1 (mean ± SD)	Non-tumorous, n = 1 (mean ± SD)
Mean HU	129 ± 20.3	158 ± 20.4	143.8 ± 24.3	164 ± 37.9	77 ± 16
IC	29.5 ± 9.3	38.2 ± 9.8	31.1 ± 6.8	49.8 ± 11.5	11.8 ± 9
WC	1032.5 ± 12.8	1048 ± 11.3	1043 ± 11.6	1037 ± 11.4	1028 ± 20.4
NIC	0.35 ± 0.15	0.60 ± 0.19	0.66 ± 0.25	0.37 ± 0.24	0.19 ± 0.14

Amelo: Ameloblastoma; OKC: Odontogenic keratocysts; OF: Ossifying fibromas; CGCG: Central giant cell granuloma; SG tumors: Salivary gland tumors; IC: Iodine concentration; WC: Water concentration; NIC: Normalized iodine concentration; CMF: Chondromyxoid fibroma

Citation: Viswanathan DJ, Bhalla AS, Manchanda S, Roychoudhury A, Mishra D, Mridha AR. Characterization of tumors of jaw: Additive value of contrast enhancement and dual-energy computed tomography. World J Radiol 2024; 16(4): 82-93
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v16/i4/82.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v16.i4.82