Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Radiol. Mar 28, 2024; 16(3): 49-57
Published online Mar 28, 2024. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i3.49
Published online Mar 28, 2024. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i3.49
MAG-3 primary, n = 30 (75) | DMRU secondary, n = 30 (75) | DMRU primary, n = 10 (25) | MAG-3 secondary, n = 10 (25) | |
Affected kidney | 42 (28-48) | 42 (22-50) | 22 (15-40) | 38 (31-45) |
Age, months | 13 (4-48) | 29 (9-109) | 41 (11-129) | 12 (4-116) |
Affected renal size, mm | ||||
RUS | 28 (24-35) | XY | 28.5 (13) | XY |
MRI | 28 (21-35) | |||
Before furosemide | 30 (24-38) | 26 (11) | ||
After furosemide | 30 (17) | |||
Surgical decision | No | Yes | No | Yes |
- Citation: Al-Shaqsi Y, Peycelon M, Paye-Jaouen A, Carricaburu E, Tanase A, Grapin-Dagorno C, El-Ghoneimi A. Evaluating pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Dynamic magnetic resonance urography vs renal scintigraphy 99m-technetium mercaptoacetyltriglycine. World J Radiol 2024; 16(3): 49-57
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v16/i3/49.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v16.i3.49