Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Radiol. Jun 28, 2023; 15(6): 201-215
Published online Jun 28, 2023. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v15.i6.201
Published online Jun 28, 2023. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v15.i6.201
Table 4 Inter-observer agreement of computed tomography angiography measurements of aneurysm
| Size | Dome | Neck | Dome/neck ratio | |||||
| Reader 1 | Reader 2 | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | |
| Mean | 7.4 | 7.4 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Median | 6 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| SD | 5.44 | 5.47 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Minimum | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Maximum | 40 | 42 | 22 | 22 | 20 | 20 | 4.7 | 5.6 |
| ICC | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.98 | ||||
| 95%CI | (0.96-0.98) | (0.96-0.97) | (0.95-0.97) | (0.97-0.98) | ||||
- Citation: Elmokadem AH, Elged BA, Abdel Razek A, El-Serougy LG, Kasem MA, EL-Adalany MA. Interobserver reliability of computed tomography angiography in the assessment of ruptured intracranial aneurysm and impact on patient management. World J Radiol 2023; 15(6): 201-215
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v15/i6/201.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v15.i6.201