Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Radiol. Feb 28, 2023; 15(2): 32-41
Published online Feb 28, 2023. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v15.i2.32
Published online Feb 28, 2023. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v15.i2.32
Figure 2 Subjective imaging quality scores.
A: Excellent imaging quality (IQ) (score = 5) with sharp, smooth contours of the vascular wall and no streaking or radiating artifacts; B: Good IQ (score = 4) with slight irregularities on the contour and few streaks or radiating artifacts; C: Fair IQ (score = 3) with blurred and irregular contours of the vascular wall and numerous streaks or radiating artifacts; D: Poor IQ (score = 2) with deformation of the vascular wall and various artifacts; E: Very poor IQ (score = 1) with obvious deformation of the vascular wall and extensive artifacts. Images with IQ scores within 3-5 satisfy the requirements for the diagnostic assessment.
- Citation: Hu XL, Huang PK, Zhang M, Chen J, Xiao MQ. Effects of combining multiple dose reduction techniques on coronary computed tomography angiography. World J Radiol 2023; 15(2): 32-41
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v15/i2/32.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v15.i2.32