Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Radiol. Dec 28, 2023; 15(12): 338-349
Published online Dec 28, 2023. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v15.i12.338
Table 4 Inter-reader agreement between the two radiologists
Qualitative assessment
Imaging
κ value (95%CI)
P value
Sharpness of pancreas contourFOCUS-DLR+0.73 (0.52–0.95)< 0.0011
FOCUS-DLR-0.69 (0.45–0.93)< 0.0011
FOCUS-conv0.66 (0.43–0.89)< 0.0011
Image noiseFOCUS-DLR+0.69 (0.46–0.92)< 0.0011
FOCUS-DLR-0.70 (0.50–0.90)< 0.0011
FOCUS-conv0.64 (0.42–0.87)< 0.0011
Distortion of pancreasFOCUS-DLR+0.61 (0.40–0.82)< 0.0011
FOCUS-DLR-0.71 (0.53–0.89)< 0.0011
FOCUS-conv0.61 (0.41–0.82)< 0.0011
Visualization of pancreas cystic lesionFOCUS-DLR+0.80 (0.56–1.03)< 0.0011
FOCUS-DLR-0.76 (0.60–0.93)< 0.0011
FOCUS-conv0.71 (0.51–0.91)< 0.0011
Visualization of MPD on ADC mapFOCUS-DLR+0.67 (0.51–0.83)< 0.0011
FOCUS-DLR-0.75 (0.60–0.90)< 0.0011
FOCUS-conv0.74 (0.54–0.94)< 0.0011