Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Radiol. Dec 28, 2023; 15(12): 338-349
Published online Dec 28, 2023. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v15.i12.338
Table 3 The results of the two radiologists' qualitative assessments
Qualitative assessment
Reader
Mean image-quality score
P value
Friedman test
Bonferroni post-hoc test
FOCUS-DLR+
FOCUS-DLR-
FOCUS-conv

FOCUS-DLR+ vs FOCUS-DLR-
FOCUS-DLR+ vs FOCUS-conv
FOCUS-DLR- vs FOCUS-conv
Sharpness of pancreas contourR13.3232.24< 0.00110.31< 0.00110.0011
R23.323.032.05< 0.00110.49< 0.0011< 0.0011
Image noiseR13.652.72.86< 0.00 11< 0.0011< 0.00111
R23.592.542.7< 0.0011< 0.0011< 0.00110.97
Distortion of pancreasR13.163.113.050.05N/AN/AN/A
R23.113.183.050.73N/AN/AN/A
Visualization of pancreas cystic lesionR13.73.492.89< 0.00110.670.01610.35
R23.623.322.7< 0.00110.240.00110.17
Visualization of MPD on ADC mapR12.972.542.19< 0.00110.170.00310.49
R22.732.241.99< 0.00110.110.00110.35