Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Radiol. Mar 28, 2022; 14(3): 60-69
Published online Mar 28, 2022. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v14.i3.60
Table 3 Characteristics of included studies
Ref.
Study design
Patients (n)
Mean age
Type of cancer
Intervention
Patient survival
Graft survival
Binsaleh et al[15], 2011 Retrospective 955 (range: 40-72)PCaRT (60-66 Gy); 3 patients had their immunosuppressive regimen changed to a sirolimus-based therapy, while 6 had “judicious” reductions of CNI dosagesNR4/9 failure; 5/9 good
Pettenati et al[20], 2016 Retrospective 663.5 yr (± 7.2)PCaRT (EBRT: 76 Gy; IRT: 145 Gy) +Immunosuppressive therapy [2 pts: CNI + AZA + steroids; 19 pts: CNI + MMF + Steroids; 2 pts: MMF, mTORI + Steroids]1 patient died of PCaNo graft loss nor change in renal function due to PCa treatment
Antunes et al[13], 2018 Retrospective 2953.4 (±10,7)PCaRT in 5 patients (details not reported)1-yr: 86.2%5-yr: 86.2%10-yr: 79.3%No patient undergoing RT had allograft failure
Oh et al[26], 2019 Retrospective 1366 (range: 42-80)PCaRT (EBRT: 78 Gy; IRT: 144 Gy) + Immunosuppressive therapy [CIA (n = 8), MMF (n = 13), AZA (n = 3), tacrolimus (n = 12), sirolimus (n = 9), and/or prednisone (n = 20)]3 yr: 93.8%NR
Tasaki et al[21], 2019 Retrospective 365 (range: 60-67)PCaRT (IRT: 145 Gy) + Immunosuppressive therapy [2 pts: CIA + MMF + MP; 1 pt: tacrolimus + MMF +MP]NR2 pts good graft function; 1 pt declined graft function after 2 yr
Velvet et al[27], 2019 Retrospective 359.5LymphomaRT (details not reported) + reduced immunosuppressive regimen6 mo: 66.6%NR