Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Radiol. Oct 28, 2022; 14(10): 352-366
Published online Oct 28, 2022. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v14.i10.352
Table 4 Comparison of diagnostic performance of three reading sessions including abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging protocol 2

Reader 3
Reader 4
Ab-MRI
Standard MRI
Ab-MRI + CE-CT
P value (Ab-MRI vs standard)
P value (Ab-MRI vs Ab-MRI + CE-CT)
P value (standard vs Ab-MRI + CE-CT)
Ab-MRI
Standard MRI
Ab-MRI + CE-CT
P value (Ab-MRI vs standard)
P value (Ab-MRI vs Ab-MRI + CE-CT)
P value (standard vs Ab-MRI + CE-CT)
Sensitivity93.3 (90.7-95.0)94.9 (92.7-95.9)95.9 (93.8-96.9)0.250.0630.594.4 (90.1- 97.2)95.9 (93.8-96.9)96.9 (95.1-97.6)0.250.0630.5
Specificity96 (93.1-97.8)98.3 (95.9-99.4)98.3 (96.0-99.4)0.1250.125> 0.9997.7 (94.3-99.4)98.3 (96.0-99.4)98.9 (96.8-99.7)> 0.990.5> 0.99
PPV96.3 (93.6-98.0)98.4 (96.2-99.4)98.4 (96.3-99.4)0.1250.125> 0.9997.9 (94.6-99.4)98.4 (96.3-99.4)99 (97.1-99.7)> 0.990.5> 0.99
NPV92.8 (90.0-94.6)94.5 (92.2-95.6)95.6 (93.3-96.6)0.50.1250.594 (89.4-96.9)95.6 (93.3-96.6)96.7 (94.7-97.5)0.250.0630.5
Accuracy94.6 (91.9-96.3)96.5 (94.2-97.5)97 (94.9-98.0)0.0160.0040.595.9 (93.4-97.7)97 (94.9-98.0)97.8 (95.9-98.6)0.1250.0630.5
AUROC0.947 (0.924-0.969)0.943 (0.919-0.967)0.948 (0.925-0.971)0.6030.8620.1560.960 (0.941-0.980)0.971 (0.954-0.988)0.979 (0.964-0.993)0.0450.0070.083