Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Radiol. Oct 28, 2022; 14(10): 352-366
Published online Oct 28, 2022. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v14.i10.352
Table 3 Comparison of diagnostic performance of three reading sessions including abbreviated magnetic resonance imaging protocol 1
Reader 1
Reader 2
Ab-MRI
Standard MRI
Ab-MRI + CE-CT
P value (Ab-MRI vs standard)
P value (Ab-MRI vs Ab-MRI + CE-CT)
P value (standard vs Ab-MRI + CE-CT)
Ab-MRI
Standard MRI
Ab-MRI + CE-CT
P value (Ab-MRI vs standard)
P value (Ab-MRI vs Ab-MRI + CE-CT)
P value (standard vs Ab-MRI + CE-CT)
Sensitivity93.3 (88.9-96.4)94.4 (92.3-95.1)93.8 (91.8-94.6)0.5> 0.99> 0.9991.3 (88.9-92.5)93.8 (91.7-94.8)93.3 (91.1-94.3)0.0630.125> 0.99
Specificity97.1 (93.5-99.1)98.9 (96.6-99.7)98.9 (96.6-99.7)0.1250.25> 0.9997.7 (95.0-99.1)98.3 (95.8-99.4)98.3 (95.8-99.4)> 0.99> 0.99> 0.99
PPV97.3 (93.9-99.1)98.9 (96.8-99.7)98.9 (96.8-99.7)0.250.25> 0.9997.8 (95.2-99.1)98.4 (96.1-99.4)98.4 (96.0-99.4)0.250.25> 0.99
NPV92.9 (88.2-96.2)94 (91.9-94.8)93.5 (91.4-94.3)0.5> 0.99> 0.9991 (85.9-94.6)93.5 (91.2-94.5)93 (90.6-94.0)0.0630.125> 0.99
Accuracy95.1 (92.4-97.1)96.5 (94.4-97.3)96.2 (94.1-97.0)0.0630.125> 0.9994.3 (91.8-95.6)95.9 (93.6-97.0)95.7 (93.3-96.7)0.0310.063> 0.99
AUROC0.952 (0.931-0.974)0.966 (0.948-0.984)0.964 (0.945-0.982)0.0250.0450.3170.945 (0.922-0.968)0.961 (0.941-0.980)0.958 (0.938-0.978)0.0140.0250.317