Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Radiol. Jan 28, 2022; 14(1): 19-29
Published online Jan 28, 2022. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v14.i1.19
Table 5 The relative sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value per Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Level on the pre-training assessment compared to the reference standard
Pre-training, StatisticsTI-RADS 1, %TI-RADS 2, %TI-RADS 3, %TI-RADS 4, %TI-RADS 5, %
Sensitivity
R19.1 (0.2-41.3)33.3 (7.5-70.1)44.4 (13.7-78.8)30.8 (9.1-61.4)87.5 (47.4-99.7)
R29.1 (0.2-41.3)0 (0-33.6)11.1 (0.3-48.3)38.5 (13.9-68.4)75 (34.9-96.8)
R390.9 (58.7-99.8)33.3 (7.5-70.1)44.4 (13.7-78.8)38.5 (13.9-68.4) 37.5 (8.5-75.5)
Pooled36.4 (20.4-54.9)22.2 (8.6-42.3)33.3 (16.5-54)35.9 (21.2-52.8)66.7 (44.7-84.4)
Specificity
R1100 (91.0-100)90.2 (76.9-97.3)92.7 (80.1-98.5)62.2 (44.8-77.5)76.2 (60.6-88)
R2100 (91-100)97.6 (87.1-99.9)80.5 (65.1-91.2)81.1 (64.8-92)50 (34.2-65.8)
R366.7 (49.8-80.9)97.6 (87.1-99.9)95.1 (83.5-99.4)89.2 (74.6-97)90.5 (77.4-97.3)
Pooled88.9 (81.8-94)95.1 (89.7-98.2)89.4 (82.6-94.3)76.6 (67.6-84.1)72.2 (63.5-79.8)
Positive predictive value
R110042.9 (16.8-73.6)57.1 (26.4-83.2)22.2 (10.3-41.6)41.2 (27.7-56.1)
R2100011.1 (1.8-46.8)41.7 (21.5-65.1)22.2 (14.8-32.1)
R343.5 (32.2-55.5)75 (26-96.2)66.7 (30.1-90.3)55.6 (28.3-79.8)42.9 (17.1-73.2)
Pooled48 (31.8-64.6)50 (25.9-74.1)40.9 (24.8-59.2)35 (23.9-48)31.4 (23.5-40.5)
Negative predictive value
R179.6 (76.4-82.5)86.1 (79.4-90.8)88.4 (80.8-93.2)71.9 (62.2-79.9)97 (83.5-99.5)
R279.6 (76.4-82.5)81.6 (80.9-82.4)80.5 (75.8-84.5)79 (70.4-85.6)91.3 (75.3-97.3)
R396.3 (79.8-99.4)87 (80.7-91.4)88.6 (81.2-93.4)80.5 (72.6-86.5)88.4 (81.5-92.9)
Pooled83.2 (79.2-86.6)84.8 (81.9-87.3)85.9 (82.3-88.9)77.3 (72.5-81.5)91.9 (86.5-95.3)