Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Radiol. Jul 28, 2019; 11(7): 94-101
Published online Jul 28, 2019. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v11.i7.94
Published online Jul 28, 2019. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v11.i7.94
Table 1 Genial tubercles pattern distribution as a function of sex
| Type | Gender | Total | ||||
| Male (n = 106) (% = 32%) | Female (n = 49) (% = 68%) | |||||
| No | % | No | % | No | % | |
| I | 14 | 13.20% | 8 | 16.30% | 22 | 14.20% |
| II | 24 | 22.60% | 11 | 22.40% | 35 | 22.60% |
| III | 39 | 36.80% | 18 | 36.70% | 57 | 36.80% |
| IV | 23 | 21.70% | 8 | 16.30% | 31 | 20% |
| V | 6 | 5.70% | 4 | 8.20% | 10 | 6.40% |
- Citation: Araby YA, Alhirabi AA, Santawy AH. Genial tubercles: Morphological study of the controversial anatomical landmark using cone beam computed tomography. World J Radiol 2019; 11(7): 94-101
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v11/i7/94.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v11.i7.94