Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Jul 26, 2017; 9(7): 609-619
Published online Jul 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i7.609
Published online Jul 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i7.609
Table 1 Study design and participant characteristics
Ref. | Study design/country/year | No. of participants | Mean age | % male | Participant inclusion criteria and procedural details |
Benit et al[26] | Randomized trial; Belgium; 1994-1995 | 50 | 57.7 | 100% | Participants had transradial coronary angioplasty with 6-Fr catheters and Palmaz-Schatz stent |
Campeau et al[27] | Cohort study; Canada; Unclear | 100 | 58 (median) | 90% | Participants had transradial coronary angiogram with 5-Fr, 6-Fr and 7-Fr sheath |
Chatelain et al[28] | Cohort study; Switzerland; 1995-1997 | 159 | 60 | 82% | Participants had transradial diagnostic and interventional cardiac procedures with 4-Fr, 5-Fr or 6-Fr introducer sheath and guide catheters with RadiStop radial compression system |
De Belder et al[29] | Cohort study; United Kingdom; Unclear | 75 | Unclear | 69% | Participants had transradial coronary angiography and intervention and severe peripheral vascular disease with 5-Fr or 6-Fr sheath and 6-Fr guide catheter |
Kiemeneij et al[30] | Cohort study; The Netherlands; 1992-1993 | 100 | 62 | 77% | Participants had transradial coronary angiography with 6-Fr introducer and 6-Fr-guide catheters |
Lotan et al[31] | Cohort study; Israel; 1994 | 100 | 61 | 79% | Participants had transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty with 6-Fr introducer and 6-Fr guide catheters |
Prull et al[32] | Cohort study; Germany; Unclear | 93 | 62.5 | 80.6% | Participants had transradial diagnostic cardiac catheterization with 5-Fr or 6-Fr sheath or transradial coronary intervention with 7-Fr sheath |
Sciahbasi et al[33] | Prospective cohort study; Italy; Unclear | 99 | 65 | 72% | Participants had transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty with 6-Fr introducer sheath |
Tharmaratnam et al[35] | Retrospective case control study; United Kingdom; 2005-2006 | 1283 | 65.5 | 79% | Participants had transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty |
Valgimigli et al[39] | Prospective cohort study; The Netherlands, Italy; 2014 | 942 | 70 | 73% | Participants had transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty |
Van Leeuwen et al[24] | Prospective cohort study; The Netherlands; 2015 | 286 | 64 | 72% | Participants had transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty with 6-Fr introducer sheath |
Wu et al[37] | Cohort study; United States; 1996-1998 | 40 | 65 | 88% | Participants underwent 6-Fr and 8-Fr transradial procedure |
Zankl et al[34] | Prospective cohort study; Germany; 2010 | 488 | Unclear | Unclear | Participants had transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty with 5- and 6-Fr introducer, 4-, 5- and 6-Fr catheters |
- Citation: Ul Haq MA, Rashid M, Kwok CS, Wong CW, Nolan J, Mamas MA. Hand dysfunction after transradial artery catheterization for coronary procedures. World J Cardiol 2017; 9(7): 609-619
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v9/i7/609.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i7.609