Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Jun 26, 2017; 9(6): 481-495
Published online Jun 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i6.481
Published online Jun 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i6.481
Criteria | Class of indication | Differences between guidelines | |
ESC/EACTS | AHA/ACC | ||
Symptomatic severe AR (any LVEF) | I | I | |
Asymptomatic severe AR with depressed LV function (LVEF < 50%) | I | I | |
Severe AR in patients with another indication for cardiac surgery (e.g., CABG, thoracic aorta, another valve) | I | I | |
Asymptomatic severe AR with normal LVEF (> 50%) but with severe LV dilatation | IIa | IIa | Definition of severe LV dilatation: ESC/EACTS guideline: End-diastolic LV diameter > 70 mm, or end-systolic LV diameter > 50 mm (or > 25 mm/m2); AHA/ACC guidelines: End-systolic LV diameter > 50 mm |
Moderate AR in patients with another indication for cardiac surgery (e.g., coronary bypass, thoracic aorta, another valve) | - | IIa | This indication is not covered in the ESC/EACTS guidelines |
Severe AR with normal LVEF (> 50%) but with progressive LV dilatation (end-diastolic LV diameter > 65 mm) if the surgical risk is low | - | IIb | This indication is not covered in the ESC/EACTS guidelines |
- Citation: Mǎrgulescu AD. Assessment of aortic valve disease - a clinician oriented review. World J Cardiol 2017; 9(6): 481-495
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v9/i6/481.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i6.481