Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Cardiol. Apr 26, 2017; 9(4): 339-346
Published online Apr 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i4.339
Published online Apr 26, 2017. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i4.339
Characteristics [n (%)] | BIMA group (n = 167) | LIMA-SVG group (n = 263) | P |
All-cause mortality | 13 (7.8) | 27 (10.3) | 0.49 |
Cardiovascular mortality | 8 (4.8) | 23 (8.7) | 0.10 |
Myocardial infarction | 7 (4.2) | 10 (3.8) | 0.80 |
Redo CABG | 2 (1.2) | 2 (0.8) | 0.64 |
Stroke | 2 (1.2) | 10 (3.8) | 0.14 |
Mesenteric ischemia | 3 (1.8) | 5 (1.9) | 0.94 |
Mediastinitis | 9 (5.3) | 6 (2.3) | 0.11 |
Cardiac rehabilitation | 79 (47.3) | 104 (39.5) | 0.40 |
1-yr follow up LVEF | 44.2% ± 10.1% | 41.3% ± 10.2% | 0.81 |
- Citation: Popovic B, Maureira P, Juilliere Y, Danchin N, Voilliot D, Vanhuyse F, Villemot JP. Bilateral vs unilateral internal mammary revascularization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. World J Cardiol 2017; 9(4): 339-346
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v9/i4/339.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v9.i4.339